Register - Log in - Memberlist - Search - FAQ - Userbars Guitar Forum
Pacific Drums by DW MXR 5-Piece Shell Pack | New Posts | Unanswered Posts Reply to topic
Home - Heads - Aquarian: Response 2 or Performace II?
Author Message
Reply with quote
Post Aquarian: Response 2 or Performace II? 
I need new heads for my toms and snare. I play Heavy/Thrash Metal on drums daily.

I want Aquarian heads because: 1) I want to try something new 2) I heard many good things about them.

For my toms; which heads better suit me? Response II or Performance II heads?

For my bass drum; idk? any ideas?

For my snare drum; I was planning on this. http://www.musiciansfriend.com/product/Remo-Coated-Controlled-Sound-Reverse-Dot-Snare-Head?sku=442500

What do you think?

Thanks Smile







Reply with quote
Post  
Do you want your drums to resonate or sound like tuned cardboard boxes?









Last edited by SGarrett on Mon Feb 25, 2008 5:00 am; edited 1 time in total

_________________
Dr. Rodney McKay wrote:
Well, I only know one thing and that is that flying darkness that eats energy can only be very, very bad.


http://www.MySpace.com/PageFive
Reply with quote
Post  
uh Shocked

like normal metal sounding toms? Confused Confused







Reply with quote
Post  
I play coated Response 2 heads and have also used Performance II heads. The PII heads are more like classic rock heads because they're very dead sounding.








_________________
Dr. Rodney McKay wrote:
Well, I only know one thing and that is that flying darkness that eats energy can only be very, very bad.


http://www.MySpace.com/PageFive
Reply with quote
Post  
so which ones do you recommend for fast metal playing? the PII's?








_________________
www.youtube.com/Manzo27
Reply with quote
Post  
Manzo wrote:
so which ones do you recommend for fast metal playing? the PII's?


Only if you have your own mic's.








_________________
Dr. Rodney McKay wrote:
Well, I only know one thing and that is that flying darkness that eats energy can only be very, very bad.


http://www.MySpace.com/PageFive
Reply with quote
Post  
I have used both. I love Aquarian. The erformance II's are designed for LOOSE tuning. It tells you on their website. It will give you alot of low end BUT I find trying to achieve another sound besides that won't happen. You can tune them up and they won't sound right. They are designed for one specific sound. Now the Response II's will give you a larger variety of sounds. You can tune them for a low end tone AND also tune them higher for a great sound. So having used both I recommend the Response II's for projection purposes (especially if you don't mic the drums)







Reply with quote
Post  
BlakeN70 wrote:
I have used both. I love Aquarian. The erformance II's are designed for LOOSE tuning. It tells you on their website. It will give you alot of low end BUT I find trying to achieve another sound besides that won't happen. You can tune them up and they won't sound right. They are designed for one specific sound. Now the Response II's will give you a larger variety of sounds. You can tune them for a low end tone AND also tune them higher for a great sound. So having used both I recommend the Response II's for projection purposes (especially if you don't mic the drums)


So the response 2 can do low end too right? Cause I like that low end sound with not much overtone. I think I'd just get these tune em low and slap on some moongels







Reply with quote
Post  
You can tune any drum head low. Don't forget how important the tuning of your resonant head is going to be. Smile








_________________
Dr. Rodney McKay wrote:
Well, I only know one thing and that is that flying darkness that eats energy can only be very, very bad.


http://www.MySpace.com/PageFive
Reply with quote
Post  
Hey cjdubya17, I have performance 2's and they give the most low end sound i've ever heard with hardly any overtone. I recomend performance 2's but thats just my oppinion. Try them out they're super cheap Very Happy







Reply with quote
Post  
You want a SuperKick II for kick batter, and a Hi-Energy for snare batter.








_________________
_...:::/ Jimbob2020 agrees \:::..._
Reply with quote
Post  
Mitchell? wrote:
You want a SuperKick II for kick batter, and a Hi-Energy for snare batter.


For metal, I would have to agree with these recommendations. As others have said, the Performance IIs have an amazing sound for a floor tom, or a deep sounding rack tom. If, however, you want a higher tom sound, I would steer clear from them. If you are doing like 8" or 10" rack toms, the Performance IIs will probably deaden the sound a lot. So, pretty much, if you're playing on like a 7-Piece, I would use Performance IIs on the floor toms, and something else on the rack toms. If you are just playing a 4-Piece, it depends on how much low end you want on the rack tom.








_________________
Sonor Drums, Aquarian Heads, Saluda Cymbals, Vic Firth Sticks

14" Diamond Rock Hats, 16" Diamond Rock Crash (Cracked...), 22" Symbolic Ride
14" Pre-Aged Voodoo China, 18" Mist X Medium Thin Crash (Cracked...)
Reply with quote
Post  
I've been looking at those Super 2's with the studio-x ring, anyone use those?








_________________
Random Hand
Me!!



Mapex Drums
DW8000 Pedals
Sabian Cymbals
Vater Sticks




Home - Heads - Aquarian: Response 2 or Performace II?
Display posts from previous:
Page 1 of 1 Reply to topic
 
  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Next topic:
Started a new music project - Kitchen Pass

Drums My Life.com 2006-2007 © All Rights Reserved - Contact Us Powered by phpBB (sitemaps: D, G)
Cell Phones | Remortgage | Loans | Loans | News